HEALTHSTREAM, INC.

500 11^TH Avenue North, Suite 1000

Nashville, Tennessee 37203

(615) 301-3100

NOTICE OF 20222023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held May 26, 202225, 2023

Dear Shareholder:

On Thursday, May 26, 2022,25, 2023, HealthStream, Inc. will hold its 20222023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Due to public health concerns regarding the coronavirus pandemic and to assist in protecting the health and well-being of our shareholders and employees, theThe meeting will be held virtually via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. Shareholders of record and holders of shares in “street name,” in each case as of March 28, 2022,29, 2023, will be able to listen, vote, and submit questions, regardless of location, via the Internet by following the procedures set forth below in this proxy statement below under “How Do I Attend the Annual Meeting?”. The meeting webcast will begin at 2:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on May 26, 2022,25, 2023, and we encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time.

At this meeting, we will consider the following proposals:

In reliance on SEC rules which allow issuers to make proxy materials available to shareholders on the Internet, we are mailing our shareholders a notice instead of paper copies of our proxy statement and our annual report. The notice contains instructions on how to access those documents on the Internet. The notice also contains instructions on how shareholders can receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, including the proxy statement, our 20212022 annual report, and a form of proxy card.

Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual meeting, we request that you vote as soon as possible.

PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on May 26, 2022:25, 2023: The Company’s Proxy Statement, Proxy Card, and 20212022 Annual Report to Shareholders are available to registered and beneficial shareholders at http://www.edocumentview.com/HSTM. This notice is not a form for voting and presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials whichthat contain important information. We encourage all shareholders to access and review the proxy materials before voting.

These materials were made available to shareholders on April 14, 2022.10, 2023.

What is the Purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At HealthStream’s Annual Meeting, shareholders will act upon (i) the election of three (3)two (2) persons nominated by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) and identified in this proxy statement as Class III directors, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022,2023, (iii) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers under applicable SEC rules (the “Named Executive Officers”) as described in this proxy statement, (iv) the approval of the 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan as described in this proxy statement; and (v)(iv) any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held on May 26, 2022,25, 2023, and will begin at 2:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time.

What are the Board’s Recommendations?

Our Board recommends that you vote:

What Happens if I Do Not Give Specific Voting Instructions?

Shareholders of Record. If you are a shareholder of record (that is, if you hold your shares in your own name with our transfer agent) and you:

then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” (that is, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee), you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote your shares and will receive materials and voting instructions from any such nominee with respect to voting your shares. New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Rule 452 (“Rule 452”) provides that brokers, banks, and other nominees may not exercise their voting discretion on specified non-routine matters without receiving instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Because Rule 452 applies specifically to securities brokers, virtually all of whom are governed by NYSE rules, Rule 452 applies to all companies listed on a national stock exchange including companies (such as the Company) listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Therefore, since proposal one (the election of directors), and proposal three (the non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation), and proposal four (the approval of our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan) are not considered routine under Rule 452, if you do not issue instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee with respect to these proposals, your broker, bank, or other nominee will not be allowed to exercise its voting discretion (the “non-vote”). As such, with respect to these proposals, broker non-votes will not impact the outcome of proposals one three, or four.three. For proposal two, the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm, absent receiving instructions from you, your broker may vote your shares at its discretion on your behalf. If your shares are held in street name and you do not give your broker, bank, or other nominee instructions on how to vote, your shares will still be counted toward the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting provided that your broker, bank, or other nominee votes your shares utilizing its discretionary authority for proposal two as noted above.

How Do I Attend the Annual Meeting?

As the result of public health concerns arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, ourOur Annual Meeting will be held on a virtual basis, meaning that you attend the Annual Meeting via the internet. Shareholders of record and holders of shares in street name, in each case as of March 28, 2022,29, 2023, may attend the virtual meeting by following the instructions set forth below.

Shareholders of Record. In order to attend the Annual Meeting, shareholders of record must have the information that is printed on their notice or proxy card. Shareholders of record may attend the virtual meeting by logging in at www.meetnow.global/MKR7NWDMTMKHNA and providing the applicable information set forth on their notice or proxy card along with the password for the Annual Meeting (HSTM2022).card. 

Street Name Holders. In order to attend the Annual Meeting, holders of shares in street name will need to register to attend in advance. To register to attend the Annual Meeting, street name holders must (i) follow the procedures provided by their broker, bank, or other nominee that holds their shares for obtaining a legal proxy; and (ii) register with Computershare by submitting proof of such holder’s legal proxy reflecting such holder’s HealthStream holdings, along with such holder’s name and email address, to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and must be received no later than 2:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on May 23, 2022.22, 2023. Street name holders will receive a confirmation of their registration by e-mail after Computershare has received their registration materials.

Requests for registration should be directed to Computershare by either e-mail or mail as follows:

By e-mail:

Forward the email from your broker or attach an image of your legal proxy to legalproxy@computershare.com

By mail:

Computershare

HealthStream, Inc. Legal Proxy

P.O. Box 43001

Providence, RI 02940-3001

After a street name holder has received confirmation of registration, the street name holder may participate in the meeting by logging in at www.meetnow.global/MKR7NWDMTMKHNA and entering the control number provided with the confirmation of registration, along with the password for the Annual Meeting (HSTM2022).registration.

Shareholder Questions. We intend to answer questions pertinent to Company matters in accordance with our rules of conduct and procedures as time allows during the Annual Meeting. Questions may be submitted over the internet prior to or during the Annual Meeting by holders of record and holders of shares in street name participating in the Annual Meeting on a virtual basis who have logged in to the annual meeting page at www.meetnow.global/MKR7NWDMTMKHNA and have followed the instructions on such webpage for submitting a question. In order to allow maximum participation, we will limit each holder to one question. If any question submitted by a holder of record or holder in street name is not addressed at the Annual Meeting, such stockholder or holder in street name may contact the Company’s Investor Relations department following the Annual Meeting at 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203 or by contacting us at (615) 301-3237 or at ir@healthstream.com.

Other Information. The meeting webcast will begin at 2:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on May 26, 2022,25, 2023, and we encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. Rules of conduct and procedures for the Annual Meeting will be available on the website set forth above once you access the meeting.

If you have difficulty accessing the meeting or have other technical difficulties, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log-in page at www.meetnow.global/MKR7NWD.MTMKHNA.

For information regarding voting at the Annual Meeting (as well as other methods of voting), see below under “How Do I Vote?”

Who is Entitled to Vote at the Annual Meeting?

The Board has fixed the close of business on Monday,Wednesday, March 28, 202229, 2023 as the record date. Shareholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 28, 202229, 2023 may vote at this meeting.

As of the record date, there were 30,582,44730,674,977 shares of our voting common stock outstanding. These shares were held by approximately 12,15113,038 record holders. Every shareholder is entitled to one vote for each share of common stock the shareholder held of record on the record date.

Who is Soliciting My Vote?

This proxy solicitation is being made and paid for by HealthStream. In addition, we have retained Computershare and Georgeson Shareholder Communications to assist in the solicitation. We will pay these entities an aggregate of approximately $6,995$7,245 plus out-of-pocket expenses for their assistance in connection with the solicitation. Our directors, officers, and other employees not specially employed for this purpose may also assist in the solicitation of proxies. They will not be paid additional remuneration for their efforts. We will also request brokers and other fiduciaries to forward proxy solicitation materialmaterials to the beneficial owners of shares of the common stock that the brokers and fiduciaries hold of record. We will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.

On What Matters May I Vote?

You may vote on (i) the election of the three (3)two (2) persons nominated by the Board and identified in this proxy statement to serve as Class III directors of our Board, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022,2023, (iii) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement, (iv) the approval of the 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan as described in this proxy statement, and (v)(iv) any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

Why Did I Receive a One-Page Notice in the Mail Regarding the Internet Availability of Proxy Materials Instead of a Full Set of Proxy Materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the SEC, the Company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials via the Internet. Accordingly, the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to the Company’s shareholders. All shareholders will have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, shareholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis.

I Share an Address With Another Shareholder, and We Received Only One Paper Copy of the Proxy Materials. How May I Obtain an Additional Copy of the Proxy Materials?

The Company has adopted a procedure called “householding” in accordance with SEC rules. Under this procedure, the Company is delivering a single copy of the Notice and, if requested, this proxy statement and the Annual Report to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless the Company has received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This procedure reduces the Company’s printing costs, mailing costs, and fees. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to be able to access and receive separate proxy cards. Upon written or oral request, the Company will deliver promptly a separate copy of the Notice and, if requested, this proxy statement and the Annual Report to any shareholder at a shared address to which the Company delivered a single copy of any of these documents. To receive a separate copy of the Notice and, if requested, this proxy statement or the Annual Report, shareholders may write or call the Company at the following address and telephone number:

HealthStream, Inc.

Investor Relations Department

500 11^th Avenue North

Suite 1000

Nashville, Tennessee 37203

Telephone Number: (800) 845-1579

Email: ir@healthstream.com

How Do I Vote?

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting on a remote basis, we urge you to submit your voting instructions to the Company as soon as possible (and, in any event, prior to the meeting).

Shareholders of Record (Prior to Annual Meeting). If you are a holder of record, you may vote in advance of the Annual Meeting (1) via the Internet by following the instructions provided in the Notice, (2) by mail, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, by filling out the vote instruction form and sending it backreturning your proxy card in the envelope provided,manner described below, or (3) by telephone, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, by calling the toll free number found on the proxy card. Alternatively, you may vote at the Annual Meeting on a remote basis as described below.

If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials and properly sign your proxy card and return it in the prepaid envelope, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials and return your signed proxy card but do not mark the boxes showing how you wish to vote, your shares will be voted in the manner recommended by the Board on all matters presented in this proxy statement.

The deadline for shareholders of record to submit voting instructions by telephone or the Internet is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 25, 2022.24, 2023. For information about shareholders of record changing their vote, see below under “Can I Change My Vote?”

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name (Prior to Annual Meeting). If you hold your shares in street name, your broker, bank, or other nominee will provide you with materials and instructions for voting your shares, which may allow you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting by using the internetInternet or a toll-free telephone number. If you hold shares through more than one broker, bank, or other nominee, you will receive separate materials and voting instructions from each such nominee. You will need to separately follow the instructions received from each broker, bank, or other nominee through which you hold shares in order to ensure that all of your shares are voted. The deadline for street name holders to submit voting instructions by telephone or the Internet is 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Wednesday, May 25, 2022.24, 2023. For information about holders in street name changing their vote, see below under “Can I Change My Vote?”

Voting at Annual Meeting. Alternatively, shareholders of record and holders of shares in street name, in each case as of March 28, 2022,29, 2023, who have logged into the Annual Meeting at www.meetnow.global/MKR7NWDMTMKHNA after following the instructions set forth above under “How Do I Attend the Annual Meeting,” may vote at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions regarding how to vote set forth on such webpage.

The meeting webcast will begin at 2:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on May 26, 2022,25, 2023, and we encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time.

How Can I Get Electronic Access to the Proxy Materials?

The Notice will provide you with instructions regarding how to:

The Company’s proxy materials are also available on the Company’s website at www.healthstream.com.

Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the impact of the Company’s annual meetings on the environment. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by email, you will receive an email message next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting website. Your election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until you terminate it.

How Will Voting on Any Other Business be Conducted?

We do not know of any business to be considered at the Annual Meeting other than (i) the election of three (3)two (2) persons nominated by the Board and identified in this proxy statement as Class III directors, (ii) the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022,2023, and (iii) the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement, and (iv) the approval of the 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan.statement. Our Bylaws require shareholders of the Company to give advance notice of any proposal intended to be presented at any annual meeting. The deadline for this notice for the Annual Meeting has passed, and we did not receive any such notice made in compliance with our Bylaws. If any other business were to be properly presented at the Annual Meeting, Robert A. Frist, Jr., our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Scott A. Roberts, our Chief Financial Officer, are authorized to vote on such matters at their discretion.

What is a “Quorum”?

A “quorum” is a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock. The shares may be present at the meeting (on a virtual basis) or represented by proxy. There must be a quorum for business to be conducted at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.

What Vote is Required to Approve Each Item?

Each of the director nominees must receive affirmative votes from a plurality of the shares voting to be elected.

The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20222023 will be approved if the number of shares of Company common stock cast “FOR” such proposal exceed the number of shares of Company common stock cast “AGAINST” such proposal.

The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers as described in this proxy statement will be approved if the number of shares of Company common stock voted “FOR” such proposal exceeds the number of shares of Company common stock voted “AGAINST” such proposal.

The approval of the 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan will be approved if the number of shares of Company common stock voted "FOR" such proposal exceed the number of shares of Company common stock cast "AGAINST" such proposal.

What are My Voting Options on the Proposals?

With respect to Proposal 1, you may vote FOR or WITHHOLD your vote with respect to each of the three (3)two (2) nominees set forth in this proxy statement to serve as Class III directors on our Board.

With respect to Proposals 2 3, and 4,3, you may vote FOR the proposal, AGAINST the proposal, or you may elect to ABSTAIN from voting.

What is the Effect of Abstentions?

If you abstain from voting on any proposals,Proposals 2 or 3, you will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. So long as a quorum is present, abstaining from any of the matters being voted on at the Annual MeetingProposals 2 or 3 will have no effect on whether any such matter is approved.

What is the Effect of a Broker Non-Vote?

So long as a quorum is present, a broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of the election of Class II directors under Proposal 1 or whether proposals one, three or four areProposal 3 is approved.

Can I Change My Vote?

If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote by doing one of the following:

If you hold your shares in street name, you may change your vote by following the instructions provided by your broker, bank, or other nominee.

Who Will Count the Votes?

A representative of our transfer agent, Computershare, Louisville, Kentucky, will count the votes.

Where Can I Find the Voting Results?

We will announce the voting results at the Annual Meeting. We also will report the voting results on a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we expect to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, within four business days following the meeting.

When are Shareholder Proposals Due in Order to be Included in Our Proxy Statement for the 20232024 Annual Meeting?

Any shareholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 must be submitted in writing to Secretary, HealthStream, Inc., 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, prior to the close of business on December 15, 202212, 2023 and otherwise comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-8.

What is the Deadline for Submitting Other Business or Nominations for the 20232024 Annual Meeting?

If you bring business before the 2023 annual meeting which is not the subject of a proposal for inclusion in the proxy statement under Rule 14a-8, or if you want to submit a director nomination, our Bylaws require that you deliver notice in proper written form to our Secretary no later than February 25, 2023,2024, but not before January 26, 20232024 (or, if the 20232024 annual meeting is called for a date not within 30 days of May 26, 2023,25, 2024, the notice must be received not earlier than the 120^th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the 90^th day prior to such annual meeting or, if the first public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to such annual meeting, the 10^th day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is first made). If such notice is provided to us by a shareholder under our Bylaws, a nominating shareholder must provide the information required by our Bylaws, including information regarding the nominating shareholder and affiliated persons, and otherwise comply with the terms of our Bylaws. In addition, if such notice is in relation to a proposed director nominee, the notice must include certain biographical information regarding the proposed nominee, a completed written questionnaire with respect to such proposed nominee regarding the background and qualifications of the proposed nominee (which questionnaire will be provided by the Secretary of the Company upon request), the proposed nominee’s written consent to nomination, and the additional information set forth in our Bylaws.

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, (once effective), shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than Company nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 27, 2023.26, 2024.

Whom Should I Contact if I Have Questions?

If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or these proxy materials, please contact Michael M. Collier,Sneha Oakley, our Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and General Counsel, or Mollie Condra, our Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications, at 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, (615) 301-3237. If you are a registered shareholder and have any questions about your ownership of our common stock, please contact our transfer agent, Computershare, at 462 S. 4th Street, Suite 1600, Louisville, KY 40202, (800) 962-4284. If your shares are held in a brokerage account, please contact your broker.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

You can access our Corporate Governance Principles, committee charters, Lead Independent Director charter, Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for executive officers and directors, and other corporate governance-related information on our website, www.healthstream.com (under the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page), or by addressing a written request to HealthStream, Inc., Attention: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. Please note that our website is provided as an inactive textual reference and the information on our website, whether referenced here or elsewhere in this proxy statement, is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

We believe that effective corporate governance is important to our long-term success and our ability to create value for our shareholders. With leadership from our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Board regularly evaluates regulatory developments and trends in corporate governance to determine whether our policies and practices in this area should be enhanced. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also administers an annual skills assessment process as well as an annual self and peer evaluation process for the Board. In addition, our directors are encouraged to attend director education programs.

Directors

The Board is divided into three classes (Class I, Class II, and Class III). At each annual meeting of shareholders, directors constituting one class are elected for a three-year term. Directors who were elected by the Board to fill a vacancy in a class whose term expires in a later year are elected for a term equal to the remaining term for their respective class. The Fourth Amended and Restated Charter of the Company provides that each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of directors constituting the entire Board. The Board currently consists of nine members, of whom Mr. Dent, Dr. Stead,McLaren and Ms. TateRebrovick are standing for re-election as Class III Directors as set forth under “Proposal One – Election of Directors.” In addition, the Company's other Class II director, Michael D. Shmerling, is not standing for re-election and will be retiring from service on the Board concurrently with the Annual Meeting to be held on May 25, 2023.

The names and certain information about members of the Board are set forth below.

Robert A. Frist, Jr., one of our co‑founders, has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1990. Mr. Frist graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Business with concentrations in Finance, Economics, and Marketing from Trinity University.

The Company believes that Mr. Frist’s experience managing the day-to-day operations of the Company’s business, along with his active involvement with the Company since its inception and his comprehensive understanding of the Company’s mission, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Thompson S. Dent is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Urgent Team, LLC, an independent operator of urgent care centers. Mr. Dent is also the co-founder and Chairman of Re:Cognition Health, Ltd. London, England, an independent provider for cognitive disorders and pharmaceutical clinical trials in AlzheimersAlzheimer's and other CNS diseases. He served as executive chairman and chief executive officer of MedTel International Corporation, an international diagnostic imaging company based in Nashville, TN, from 2004 to 2008. Mr. Dent holdsearned a Masters in Healthcare Administration from The George Washington University and a Bachelor’s degree in Business from Mississippi State University. He has served as our lead Independent Director since December 15, 2014.

The Company believes that Mr. Dent’s decades of healthcare services industry expertise, including service on numerous healthcare company boards and committees, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Frank Gordon has served as managing partner of Crofton Capital LLP, a private equity fund, since 2002. Mr. Gordon currently serves on the board of directors of a number of non-profit organizations and private companies. Mr. Gordon earned a Bachelor of Science from the University of Texas in Austin and a Masters in Business Administration from Georgia State University.

The Company believes that Mr. Gordon’s extensive healthcare business experience, including, but not limited to, service as a director in a management capacity and as an investor with both start-up and well established companies, gives him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Jeffrey L. McLaren is the founder and chief executive officer of Medaxion, Inc., a leading provider of mobile anesthesia information solutions. Mr. McLaren served as the chief executive officer of SaferSleep, LLC, a provider of anesthesia information management systems from 2004 to 2007. He served as the chief executive officer of Southern Genesis, LLC, a management consulting company from 2003 to 2010. Mr. McLaren, also one of our co-founders, served as our President from 1990 to 2000 and as our Chief Product Officer from 1999 to 2000. Mr. McLaren graduated from Trinity University with a Bachelor of Arts in Business and Philosophy.

The Company believes that Mr. McLaren’s extensive healthcare business expertise, along with his intimate knowledge of the Company’s operations, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Terry Allison Rappuhn served on the board of directors of Quorum Health Corporation ("QHC"), a publicly-held operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient services from 2017 to 2020. She was chair of theQHC's board of directors from 2018 to 2020 and chair of theQHC's audit committee from 2017 until 2018. She served Akorn, Inc., a publicly-held pharmaceutical company, as a director from 2015 to 2020, including serving as a member of the nominating and governance committee and as the chair of the audit committee. From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Rappuhn served on the board of directors and audit committee of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc., a publicly-held manufacturer of beds and pressure management products for the medical market. From 2006 to 2010, she served as a director and chaired the audit committee of AGA Medical Holdings, Inc., a medical device company. From 2003 to 2007, she served as a director of Genesis HealthCare Corporation, where she chaired the audit committee, and from 2017 to 2021, she served on the board of Genesis Healthcare, Inc., an operator of skilled nursing and assisted living centers. From 1999 to April 2001, Ms. Rappuhn served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Quorum Health Group, Inc., an owner and operator of acute care hospitals. Ms. Rappuhn has 15 years of experience with Ernst & Young, LLP, is a Certified Public Accountant and holds the NACD CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight issued by NACD and Carnegie Mellon University.Cyber-Risk Oversight. Ms. Rappuhn graduated from Middle Tennessee State University with a Bachelor in Business Administration.

The Company believes that Ms. Rappuhn’s extensive financial and healthcare industry expertise, including service on numerous healthcare company boards and committees, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Linda Eskind Rebrovickis President, Impact Corporate Consulting, providing business consultingwhere she has served since 2018. Ms. Rebrovick has served on the boards of seven public and board services.private companies. In addition to HealthStream, Inc., Ms. Rebrovick serves on the Boards of Directorsis currently serving as an independent Board Director of Guidehouse, Inc. and Consensus Point, Inc. andShe previously a served on the boardboards of directors ofKPMG LLP, Tribridge Enterprise Inc., Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., and Reliant Bancorp, Inc. and Tribridge Enterprise, Inc. From April 2018 to June 2018, she served as Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Healing Technologies. While serving as Chief Executive Officer of Integrated Healing Technologies, she assisted the company with its evaluation of potential strategies and alternatives, which ultimately lead to the board deciding to wind down the company and file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection in the Middle District of Tennessee on July 9, 2018. The bankruptcy case was closed on February 16, 2021. In addition, Ms. Rebrovick previously served as Senior Client Partner, Healthcare and Technology, with Morgan Samuels, an executive search firm.

Ms. Rebrovick was a candidate in 2015 for the office of Mayor, Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County Government, and, from 2009 to 2014, she was Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Consensus Point a global provider of innovative prediction market research technology solutions.

and held leadership roles at Dell, KPMG, BearingPoint, and IBM. As Area Vice President of Dell Healthcare and EVP, Managing Partner, Healthcare, at KPMG Consulting, she was responsible for full-service business consulting, including process improvement, organizational analysis, and implementation of healthcare technology solutions. As the Chief Marketing Officer of BearingPoint, Inc., she led the global marketing organization and managed the successful rebranding of the global consulting business in 40 countries. She began her 16-year career with IBM as a Marketing Representative, Marketing Manager, and Business Unit Executive.

Ms. Rebrovick iswas a Senior2021 Fellow, Harvard University, Advanced Leadership Initiative, Harvard University. In 1977, she earned aInitiative. She received her Bachelor of Science in Marketing from Auburn University, Harbert College of Business. She has been recognized as a member of ODK and was later selected as one of theirthe Top 400 Women Graduates of the past 100 years.years at Auburn University.

Ms. Rebrovick iswas a candidate for Mayor, Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County Government, in 2015. Her current community activities include the Advisory Board, Harvard University, Edmond & Lily Safra Center for Ethics; President, Board of Trustees, Leadership Nashville. She isNashville; Chair, Development, Board of the Co-Founder,Nashville Entrepreneur Center; and Founder and former Co-Chair of the Tennessee Chapter, Women Corporate Directors, Tennessee and serves on the Board and Executive Committee, Nashville Entrepreneur Center.Directors.

The Company believes that Ms. Rebrovick’s public and private company board and executive experience, technology, market research and sales expertise, and background as a healthcare executive with global management technology and consulting companies, give her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Michael D. Shmerling is Chairman of Clearbrook Holdings Corp, a diversified private investment firm. Mr. Shmerling formerly served as the Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Board member of Kroll, Inc. and, following its sale to Marsh Inc., as a senior advisor to Marsh Inc. Mr. Shmerling currently serves on the board of directors of Renasant Corporation (Nasdaq: RNST), the public registered parent of the financial institution Renasant Bank, as well as several non-profit organizations. Mr. Shmerling received a Bachelor of Accountancy degree from the University of Oklahoma. He has been licensed as a CPA for 44 years (currently inactive).

The Company believes that Mr. Shmerling’s financial and business expertise, including a diversified background of managing and directing a variety of public and private companies, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

William W. Stead, M.D. is McKesson Foundation Professor in the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Professor of Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, where he has served as Chief Strategy Officer (2009-2020), Chief Information Officer (1991-2013) and associate vice chancellor for health affairs of Vanderbilt University (1991 to 2016). He is a founding fellow of the American College of Medical Informatics and the American Institute for Engineering in Biology and Medicine and a member of the National Academy of Medicine. He currently serves as member of the Audit Committee, National Academy of Sciences and served as a presidential appointee to the Systemic Interoperability Commission. He is past chairman, National Committee for Vital Health and Statistics, Department of Health and Human Services, Board of Regents, National Library of Medicine, and past president of the American College of Medical Informatics. Dr. Stead earned a Bachelor of Arts in Chemistry and an M.D. from Duke University.

The Company believes that Dr. Stead’s service as chief strategy officer for Vanderbilt University Medical Center, plus leadership in organizations devoted to the study of biomedical informatics, give him the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Deborah Taylor Tate previously served as the Director of the Administrative Office of the Courts for the Tennessee Supreme Court and State of Tennessee from 2015 to 2022. She also served as a member of the American Judges Association and the Conference of State Court Administrators, where she was on the national board of directors until February 2022. For the past three years, Ms. Tate served as Co-chair of the National Judicial Opioid Task Force, developing and implementing training and resources regarding the opioid epidemic to thousands of judges across the nation. Ms. Tate, a licensed attorney, served as the Supreme Court’s appointee to numerous state boards and commissions, including the Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System Board overseeing the state’s $60 billion pension fund, where she also was elected to the Audit Committee until February 2022. Ms. Tate previously served on the Tennessee Information Systems Council, which oversees all technology projects for the State of Tennessee. Currently, Ms. Tate serves as the Vice President on the Executive Board of the Leadership Nashville Alumni Association. Nationally, she serves as vice-chairman of the national Multicultural Media, Telecommunications and Internet Council. She was twice-nominated to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by President George W. Bush and unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate in 2005. She served as the only female Commissioner of the FCC until 2009, serving as chair of two Federal Joint Boards regarding advanced communications services and represented the FCC internationally at the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and in bilateral telecommunications negotiations. She was named the first ITU Envoy for her work with children’s internet policy as well as receiving the honor of Laureate for Childhood Online Protection. At the time of her presidential appointment, Ms. Tate was serving as the chairman and director of the Tennessee Regulatory Authority, the state regulatory body for all telecom and utility companies and previously served as executive director of the Health Facilities Commission overseeing the state’s healthcare facility and services regulation. Tate served on the legal counsel and senior staff for former Senator Lamar Alexander, and former Governor Don Sundquist. She presently serves as vice-chair of the National Policy Committee for Centerstone Research Institute, the leading informatics, analytics, and clinical research provider for behavioral healthcare. Ms. Tate received both her undergraduate degree and Juris Doctorate (J.D.) from the University of Tennessee, and also attended Vanderbilt Law School.

Ms. Tate serves as a Trustee for the Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee and helped co-found numerous organizations including a residential placement for mothers and children affected by addiction and a financial literacy program for middle and high school girls. She has received numerous state, national, and international awards for her professional, public and nonprofit service including the End Slavery Public Service award for her work with Human Trafficking and the Justice Janice Holder Access to Justice Award for her national work in the opioid crisis. In 2023, Ms. Tate was honored by both Houses of the Tennessee General Assembly with a Joint Resolution to honor her lifetime of public service to the state and nation as well as her non-profit work with families and children.

The Company believes that Ms. Tate’s extensive background in various legal, leadership, and policymaking roles with both healthcare companies and state and federal regulatory agencies gives her the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Board Meetings and Committees

Our business is managed under the direction of our Board. Our Board is responsible for establishing our corporate policies and strategic objectives, reviewing our overall performance, and overseeing management’s performance. The Board delegates the conduct of the business to our senior management team. Directors have regular access to senior management. They may also seek independent, outside advice. The Board oversees all major decisions to be made by the Company. The Board holds regular quarterly meetings, an annual strategic planning meeting, and meets on other occasions when advisable. The Board operates pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles, a copy of which may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com.

During 2021,2022, our Board held fivesix meetings, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Compensation Committee held threefour meetings, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held fivefour meetings. Each of our directors attended at least 75% (in the aggregate)100% of the meetings of the board and the committees on which such director served during 2021. In addition, (1) each of our directors attended all of our board meetings in 2021, except for one member who was unable to attend one meeting, (2) each of our directors serving on the Compensation Committee in 2021 attended all of the committee meetings in 2021, (3) each of our directors serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee attended all of the committee meetings in 2021, except for one member who was unable to attend one meeting, and (4) each of our directors serving on the Audit Committee attended all of the committee meetings in 2021.2022. Our Board has adopted a policy strongly encouraging all of our directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. For this Annual Meeting, the attendance of our directors will be on a remote basis as the result of the fact that we are holding a virtual annual meeting as reflected herein. All directors attended, on a remote basis, our prior annual meeting of shareholders in May 2021,2022, which was similarly held on a virtual basis as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic.basis.

Each of our directors also devotes his or her time and attention to the Board’s standing committees. The Board has established three standing committees consistent with the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market so that certain areas can be addressed in more depth than may be possible at a full Board meeting. Ad hoc task forces of board members may also be formed from time to time to consider acquisitions or other strategic issues. Each standing committee has a written charter that has been approved by the committee and the Board and that is reviewed at least annually. The committees, their primary functions, and memberships are as follows:

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are oversight of the integrity of HealthStream’s financial reporting process; oversight of our system of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, and legal compliance; oversight of the process utilized by management for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating various risks inherent in the Company’s business, including, without limitation, enterprise security risks such as privacy, data, cyber security and information security; selecting and evaluating the qualification, independence, and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm; monitoring compliance with the Company’s Code of Ethics for executive officers and directors and Code of Conduct; monitoring the reporting hotline; and providing an avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, management, and the Board.

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to the terms of an Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com. The current members of the Audit Committee are Michael D. Shmerling (Chair), Terry Allison Rappuhn, and William W. Stead, M.D. In addition, upon the retirement of Mr. Shmerling concurrent with the Annual Meeting, as noted above, the Board intends to appoint Ms. Rappuhn as the new chair of the Audit Committee in place of Mr. Shmerling and to re-appoint Linda Rebrovick as a member of the Audit Committee. The members of the Audit Committee during 2021, following C. Martin Harris, M.D.’s decision to resign from the Company’s Board of Directors effective February 26, 2021,2022, were Michael D. Shmerling (Chair), Linda Rebrovick, and William W. Stead, M.D., Terry Allison Rappuhn, and Linda Rebrovick. Ms. Rappuhn became a member of the Audit Committee in January 2022. Ms. Rebrovick ceased serving on the Audit Committee in March 2022. See “Audit Committee Report for 2021.2022.”

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate under the current listing standards of the Nasdaq and are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act. The Board also determined that each of Michael D. Shmerling and Terry Allison Rappuhn qualifieseach qualify as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert” as defined by the regulations of the SEC adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

What is the Audit Committee’s and the Board’s role in overseeing information security?

The Company places the utmost importance on information security and privacy, including protecting the data of our customers, their employees, and their patients. The Audit Committee has primary oversight responsibility regarding the Company’s information security programs, including privacy, data, cyber security, and information security risk exposures. The Audit Committee receives updates at least quarterly from management covering the Company’s programs for managing information security risks, including data privacy and data protection risks. The Audit Committee then reports to the Board on aat least a quarterly basis on such matters. The Company has adopted the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework to assess the maturity of its cybersecurity programs. Other aspects of the Company’s comprehensive information security program include:

The Company’s management regularly monitors best practices in this area and seeks to implement changes to the Company’s security programs as needed to ensure the Company maintains a robust data security and privacy program. The Company also maintains a cyber security insurance policy that provides coverage forin connection with certain cyber-related security incidents.matters.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has responsibility for reviewing and approving the salaries, bonuses, and other compensation and benefits of our executive officers; evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer; establishing and reviewing Board compensation; reviewing and advising management regarding benefits and other terms and conditions of compensation of management; reviewing the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement; issuing the Compensation Committee report included in this proxy statement; and administering the Company’s 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”"2016 Plan") and 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the "2022 Plan"), including cash bonus plans adopted pursuant to the terms of the 20162022 Plan for our Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee operates pursuant to the terms of a Compensation Committee Charter, a copy of which may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com. The current members of the Compensation Committee are (and the members of the Compensation Committee during 20212022 were) Frank Gordon (chair), Linda Rebrovick, and Jeffrey McLaren, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq. See “Compensation Committee Report for 2021.2022.”

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides assistance to the Board in identifying and recommending individuals qualified to serve as directors of the Company, reviews the composition of the Board, reviews and recommends corporate governance policies for the Company, reviews the management succession plan of the Company and annually evaluates the skills and performance of the Board, oversees environmental, social, and governance (ESG)("ESG") considerations impacting the Company, and reviews and oversees diversity-related initiatives, policies and procedures that the Company may adopt with the guidance and supervision of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates pursuant to the terms of a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, a copy of which may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com. The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are (and the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee during 20212022 were) Thompson Dent (chair), William W. Stead, M.D., and Deborah Taylor Tate, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq.

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer proposes the agenda for the Board meetings and presents the agenda to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which reviews the agenda with our Lead Independent Director and our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and may raise other matters to be included in the agenda or at the meetings. All directors receive the agenda and supporting information in advance of the meetings. Directors may raise other matters to be included in the agenda or at the meetings. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management make presentations to the Board at the meetings and a substantial portion of the meeting time is devoted to the Board’s discussion of and questions regarding these presentations.

Executive Sessions

The independent directors meet in executive session (i.e., with no members of management present) periodically, in at least two regularly scheduled meetings each year. The Lead Independent Director, or his or her designee, presides at these meetings.

Independent Directors

The Board has determined that Thompson S. Dent, Frank Gordon, Jeffrey L. McLaren, Terry Allison Rappuhn, Linda Rebrovick, Michael D. Shmerling, William W. Stead, M.D., and Deborah Taylor Tate do not have any relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that such directors are “independent” under the listing standards of Nasdaq. In addition, all of the standing committees of the Board are comprised solely of independent directors as set forth above. Robert A. Frist, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer, is not independent under the Nasdaq listing standards.standards and does not serve on any standing committee.

During this review, the Board considered whether there are or have been any transactions, relationships, or arrangements involving our non-management directors (including family members) that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of the Company in accordance with Nasdaq listing standards. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any of these relationships, transactions, or arrangements were inconsistent with a determination that such non-management directors were independent. In making its independence determinations, the Board considered the ordinary course, non-preferential relationships involving non-management directors set forth in the paragraph below, and determined that none of these relationships would cause such non-management directors to not be independent.

HealthStream in the ordinary course of business has certain vendor agreements or banking relationships with entities where twoMr. Dent, one of our directors, and Mr. McLaren, one of our directors, serve as executive officers or board members (Messrs. Dent and Shmerling).officers. These vendor agreements are for certain of the Company's SaaS offerings that are used broadly throughout the healthcare provider market, and thesuch agreements do not involve consulting or professional services. The banking relationship is a depository account. In each case, the Company considered the types and amounts of commercial dealings between the Company and the organizations with which the directorsMessrs. Dent and McLaren are affiliated as referenced above in connection with reaching its conclusion that none of these relationships constituted adid not constitute material relationshiprelationships involving theeither such director and the Company, and in each case the agreements and relationships were entered into at arms-length without the participation of the applicable board member.director.

Skills Assessment and Board Evaluation Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for assessing the Board’s skills, evaluating director performance, and providing feedback to directors in connection with the evaluation of their performance. Further, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually assesses the skills required of the Board to support appropriate governance and corporate oversight. In connection with these responsibilities, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually conducts a board skills assessment as well as self and peer evaluations for the full Board. The Board evaluation process includes self and peer reviews, suggestions for individual improvement, and year to year comparison and trend analysis for both individual directors and the Board on a composite basis. The Board annually reviews the results to improve the effectiveness of the Board as a whole. The skills assessment and Board evaluation processes are used to determine skill requirements for new director nominations, assess committee assignments, review the qualifications of incumbent directors to determine whether to recommend them to the Board as nominees for re-election, and to facilitate improvement of the effectiveness of the Board.

Leadership Structure

The Board does not have a policy regarding the separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board as the Board believes it is in the best interests of the Company to make that determination based on the position and direction of the Company, the membership of the Board, and the background and knowledge of the Chief Executive Officer. The Board has determined that having the Company's current Chief Executive Officer, Robert A. Frist, Jr., serve as Chairman is in the best interest of the Company's shareholders at this time. The Board believes that this structure makes the best use of Mr. Frist's extensive knowledge of the Company and its industry and also facilitates effective communication between the Company's management and the Board. The Board also believes that, in light of the combined role of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at the Company, it is beneficial to the Company and its investors to have a strong Lead Independent Director with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. The Board also believes that having Mr. Frist serve as Chairman of the Board provides an efficient and effective leadership model for us by fostering clear accountability, effective decision making, and alignment of corporate strategy. The Board believes that its current management structure, together withtaking into account the significant duties of the Lead Independent Director having the dutiesas described below, is in the best interest of shareholders and strikes an appropriate balance for the Company.

Thompson S. Dent serves as Lead Independent Director—a position that, at HealthStream, entails significant responsibility for independent Board leadership as noted in more detail below. During his tenure as a director, Mr. Dent has demonstrated strong leadership skills and independent thinking as well as a deep understanding of the Company’s business.

Lead Independent Director

The position of Lead Independent Director at HealthStream comes with a clear mandate and significant authority and responsibilities under a Board-approved charter. These responsibilities and authority include the following:

The Charter of the Lead Independent Director can be found on our website at www.healthstream.com (under the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page).

Risk Oversight

The Board believes that an effective risk management system should be focused on (1) timely identifying the material risks that the Company faces, (2) communicating necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant Board committee, (3) implementing appropriate and responsive risk management strategies consistent with the Company's risk profile, and (4) integrating risk management into Company decision-making. The Board has designated the Audit Committee to take the lead in overseeing risk management, and the Audit Committee makes periodic reports to the Board regarding briefings and reports provided by management and advisors as well as the Audit Committee's own analysis and conclusions regarding the adequacy of the Company's risk management processes. AMoreover, the Audit Committee oversees significant financial risk exposures and the steps that management has taken to monitor, control, and report such exposures. Another particular area of risk that the Audit Committee evaluates and oversees on a regular basis is that of cyber security and information security. A summary of this review is provided as part of the Audit Committee’s report to the Board during each quarterly Board meeting. In addition, the Board encourages management to promote a corporate culture that incorporates risk management into the Company's corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. The Board also works, with the input of the Company's executive officers, to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for the Company. Additionally,

In addition to the oversight responsibilities of the Audit Committee as summarized above, the other committees of the Board consider the risks within their areas of responsibility or as may otherwise be delegated by the Board. In this regard, on an annual basis the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and recommends an Incident Response Policy for the Board’s approval. The Incident Response Policy is intended to categorize certain risk scenarios, designate members of senior management charged with addressing them, and provide for escalation of certain risk events from management to the appropriate Board Committee or the Board as a whole. Moreover,In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees ESG risks which may impact the Company.

In addition to the Audit Committee, the other committees of the Board consider the risks within their areas of responsibility. In this regard, Moreover, the Compensation Committee considers the risks that may be implicated by our executive compensation programs. Based upon the comprehensive review of the executive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee has concluded that the Company’s executive compensation programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company as a whole.

Corporate SustainabilityResponsibility – Environmental, Social, and Governance

We believe that incorporating corporate responsibility and environmental, social and governance (ESG)ESG concerns into our day-to-day business operations helps promote long-term growth for our company. Both the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board receive periodic reports from management on our ESG initiatives, which include the following:

Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion. We are committed to fostering a work culture that promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion.inclusion ("DEI"). Our DEI strategy is grounded in our corporate DEI Point-of-View statement and demonstrates our commitment to advancing and preserving a culture of DEI. In 2021, we expanded2022, StreamForward, our employee-led DEI initiative, highlighted the scopeimportance and benefits of our diversity, equity, and inclusion program, StreamForward, through the formation of the StreamForward Steering Committee which is focused on creating a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive organization. StreamForward’s efforts, among other things, focus onorganization through education, content, programs, and training that enhance cultural competency, reduce bias, and promote a culture of belonging. Additionally, we launched DEI training for all managers, supervisors, and executives with an emphasis on unconscious bias, leading diverse teams, and fostering a diverse workplace and culture, which we subsequently expanded to the Company’s workforce as a whole. Our commitment to creating a more inclusive organization makes us a stronger organization and, in turn, drives our actions to make a positive impact on the equitable delivery of healthcare. Our DEI Point-of-View may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com

Community Engagement. Guided by the Constitutional value of “streaming good,” we strive to create a positive social impact on the communities we serve. Being outstanding stewards of our communities – at all levels – is expected of employees as we recognize the value of “giving back” to others. We live this value through our Streaming Good corporate social responsibility program which enables employees to participate in various initiatives to support our current selected organization, The American Cancer Society. Additionally, all employees are provided with paid time off to volunteer at the not-for-profit organization of their choosing through our Paid Time Off program.

Environmental Sustainability. We believe in operating our business in an environmentally responsible manner, as evidenced by our selection of a LEED-certified building as our corporate headquarters.

COVID-19 Response and Employee Health and Safety. We are committed to providing a healthy and safe working environment for our employees. In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, a key priority and concern has been and remains the health and safety of our employees. At the outset of the pandemic, we required employees at all of our offices, including our corporate headquarters, to work remotely and implemented travel restrictions enterprise wide. Beginning December 1, 2021, we began to re-open our offices on a graduated basis for employees and implemented a hybrid work policy, where employees can choose to split time between working from an office and working from home or to work solely from home or other appropriate remote location (in addition to having the option of working primarily from our offices).

Nominating Committee Process and Board Diversity

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying qualified individuals to serve as members of the Company’s Board as well as reviewing the qualifications and performance of incumbent directors to determine whether to recommend them to the Board as nominees for re-election. In identifying candidates for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include (a) ensuring that the Board, as a whole, is diverse and consists of individuals with various and relevant career experience, technical skills, industry knowledge and experience, financial expertise (including expertise that could qualify a director as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined by the rules of the SEC), and local or community ties and (b) appropriate qualifications on an individual level, including strength of character, mature judgment, time availability, familiarity with the Company’s business and industry, independence of thought, and an ability to work collegially. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may consider the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board. With respect to new candidates for Board service, a full evaluation generally also includes a detailed background check. With respect to the appointment of Ms. Rappuhn to the Board in January 2022, the above-described process was followed. Ms. Rappuhn was recommended to the Board by one of our independent Board members, Linda Rebrovick, based on her knowledge of Ms. Rappuhn and the professional qualifications of Ms. Rappuhn, including through Women Corporate Directors, an organization to which both Ms. Rebrovick and Ms. Rappuhn belong.

The Company does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees, but the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee strives to nominate directors with a variety of complementary skills and backgrounds so that, as a group, the Board will possess the appropriate talent, skills, and expertise to oversee the Company's business.

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account gender, racial, and ethnic diversity when selecting and nominating individuals to serve on the Board of Directors. In this regard, the Board currently includes three female members. Moreover, prior to the resignation of C. Martin Harris, M.D., as a member of the Board effective February 26, 2021, the Board included an African-American member. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee intends to continue to take into account racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity considerations when assessing potential candidates to serve as new members of the Board on a going forward basis.basis in light of the Company's DEI initiatives as noted above, as well as applicable laws, rules, regulations, and listing standards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider nominees for the Board recommended by shareholders as provided below. Shareholders may propose nominees for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by submitting the names and supporting information to: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, HealthStream, Inc., 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will only consider candidates who are recommended by shareholders in accordance with the procedures set forth above under “What is the Deadline for Submitting Other Business or Nominations for the 20232024 Annual Meeting?”

Board Diversity Matrix

The matrix below summarizes the self-identified gender and demographic background statistics for the Board in accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5606. Each of the categories listed in the matrix below has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).

Limitations on Other Board Service

Our Code of Conduct and Governance Principles provide that a director may not serve on more than two other public company boards without Board approval. Otherwise, we do not believe that our directors should be categorically prohibited from serving on boards and/or board committees of other organizations. Service on boards and/or committees of other organizations must also be consistent with our conflict of interest policy, as set forth in our Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for executive officers and directors, which, among other things, require a director to provide notice to the Board of his or her acceptance of a nomination to serve on the board of another public company.

Communication with the Board

Shareholders may communicate with any of the Company’s directors by writing to them c/o HealthStream, Inc., 500 11^th Avenue North, Suite 1000, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. Shareholders may also communicate with our directors by sending an email to boardofdirectors@healthstream.com. Shareholders may communicate with the chair of any committee by sending an email to auditchair@healthstream.com (Audit Committee), nomgovchair@healthstream.com (Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee), or compchair@healthstream.com (Compensation Committee), or with our outside directors as a group by sending an email to outsidedirectors@healthstream.com. Shareholders may also communicate with the Lead Independent Director by sending an email to LID@healthstream.com. Michael M. Collier, SeniorSneha Oakley, Vice President, and General Counsel is our Compliance Officer, and heshe reviews all such correspondence and regularly forwards to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of the Compliance Officer, deals with the functions of the Board or committees thereof or that heshe otherwise determines requires their attention. Concerns relating to accounting, financial reporting, internal controls, or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of the Company’s Audit Committee and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee. Concerns relating to the Board’s overall governance are brought to the immediate attention of the Lead Independent Director and are handled in accordance with procedures established by the Lead Independent Director.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Board has adopted a written Related-Party Transaction Policy (the “Policy”) providing for approval of transactions in which (1) the aggregate amount involved will or may be reasonably expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year, (2) the Company or any of its subsidiaries is a participant, and (3) any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, greater than five percent beneficial owners, or an immediate family member of any of the foregoing individuals (“Related Party”) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest (other than solely as a result of being a director, officer or a less than ten percent beneficial owner of another entity) (“Related Party Transaction”). A copy of the Policy may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com.

The Board has determined that the Audit Committee is best suited to review and approve Related Party Transactions. Pursuant to the Policy, the Audit Committee reviews Related Party Transactions and determines whether or not to approve or ratify those Related Party Transactions and may also review and approve transactions with Related Parties that do not constitute a “Related Party Transaction” as defined above as the result of not meeting the dollar or materiality thresholds set forth above; provided, however, that the Chair of the Audit Committee will review and consider any Related Party Transaction if it is not practicable for the entire committee to consider such matter. The Policy provides that the Audit Committee (or Chair) will take into the following factors, as applicable, in connection with its review of the Related Party Transaction:

As set forth in the Policy, the Audit Committee has reviewed the types of Related Party Transactions described below and determined that each of the following types of Related Party Transactions shall be deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, even if the aggregate amount involved will exceed $120,000, unless otherwise specifically determined by the Audit Committee:

Since January 1, 2021,2022, the Company has not been a participant in any transaction, and is not a participant in any currently proposed transaction, with any of our directors, executive officers, greater than five percent beneficial owners, or their respective immediate family members which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act.

Compensation Committee Interlocks

The members of the Compensation Committee are responsible for determining executive compensation and equity-based grants to executive officers. The Compensation Committee is comprised of (and during 20212022 was comprised of) Frank Gordon, Jeffrey L. McLaren, and Linda Rebrovick, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq. Other than Mr. McLaren, who served as the Company’s President from 1990 to 2000 and as Chief Product Officer from 1999 to 2000, none of these persons has at any time been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, there are no relationships among the Company’s executive officers, members of the Compensation Committee, or entities whose executive serves on the Board or the Compensation Committee that require disclosure under applicable SEC rules.

Code of Conduct

The Company has established a Code of Conduct that applies to all directors and employees of HealthStream, Inc. The purpose of the Code of Conduct is, among other things, to provide written standards for our directors and employees that are reasonably designed to support high standards of business and personal ethics in the discharge of their duties. A copy of the Code of Conduct may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com.

Code of Ethics for Executive Officers and Directors

The Company has established a Code of Ethics that applies to all executive officers and directors of HealthStream, Inc., including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. The purpose of the Code of Ethics is, among other things, to provide written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote: honest and ethical conduct, including ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest; full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents filed with the SEC and other public communications by the Company; compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations; prompt internal reporting of violations of the code; and accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics. A copy of the Code of Ethics may be accessed in the “Corporate Governance” section of the Investor Relations page of our website at www.healthstream.com. In addition, the Company intends to post amendments to or waivers, if any, from its Code of Ethics at this location on its website.

Succession Planning

Annually, during an executive session of our directors, our Board reviews the Company’s succession plan. In preparation for this session, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the Company’s succession plan with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Director Orientation

Upon the election of a new director, management and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conduct an orientation session with the new director. During this session, the director is provided with an overview of the Company’s operations, its organizational structure, its products and services, management’s risk assessment, corporate governance documents and guidelines, compliance, and reporting requirements, as well as our annual Board calendar. Orientation is further customized for any particular new director to address anticipated committee assignments or specific requests of our directors.

Strategic Planning

The Board and executive team meet annually to review the Company’s strategic plan. During this session, discussions include a high-level review of the Company’s mission and vision as well as the Company’s strategic plan for the next three to five years.

Recoupment Policy

The Company has established a recoupment policy that allows the Company to recover any incentive compensation awarded or paid to executive officers of the Company in the event that: (i) the Company is required to restate its financial statements due to its material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws (other than a restatement to comply with changes in applicable accounting principles), (ii) such executive officer, at any time after the effective date of the recoupment policy and during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to restate its financial statements, received payment or realized compensation from incentive compensation based on the erroneous financial data, (iii) such executive officer engaged in misconduct, violated the Company’s Code of Conduct, or otherwise caused or contributed to the requirement of the restatement, and (iv) in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, a lower payment would have been made to the executive officer based upon the restated financial results.

In addition, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the recovery of incentive awards in certain circumstances. If we are required to restate our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, our CEO and CFO will be required under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to reimburse us for (1) any bonus or other incentive- or equity-based compensation received during the 12 months following the first public issuance of the non-complying document, and (2) any profits realized from the sale of our securities during such 12 month period.

In 2015,The Company intends to amend its recoupment policy and/or adopt a new recoupment policy, to satisfy all applicable requirements under the SEC issued proposedfinal recoupment rules regardingadopted by the adoption of “clawback” policies by publicly listed companiesSecurities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on October 26, 2022 and the final Nasdaq listing standards to be adopted in accordance withconnection therewith, within the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). Whentimeframe that is specified in such final SEC rules implementing these requirements have been adopted and become effective, publicly listed companies will be required to adopt a “clawback” policy providing for the recovery of certain incentive-based compensation from the executive officers of the company in the event the company is required to restate its financial statements as a result of material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws. When final rules under the Dodd-Frank Act are adopted, we expect to revise our existing recoupment policy as necessary to comply with these final SEC rules.Nasdaq listing standards.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company has established an anti-hedging policy that prohibits the Company’s directors, executive officers, and certain other key employees, including vice presidents and associate vice presidents, from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions with respect to the Company’s securities. The Board believes that it is inappropriate for directors, executive officers, and officerscertain other key employees to hedge or monetize transactions to lock in the value of holdings in the Company’s securities. Such transactions, while allowing the holder to own the Company’s securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership, potentially separates the holder’s interests from those of the public shareholders of the Company. Moreover, certain short-term or speculative transactions in the Company’s securities create the potential for heightened legal risk and/or the appearance of improper or inappropriate conduct involving the Company’s securities.

Director Compensation

2021Overview. Our Compensation Committee has approved a compensation program for non-employee directors (i.e., all directors other than the Company's CEO and Chairman), which consists of both cash and equity-based compensation as further described below. Non-employee director compensation is typically reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, and adjusted if needed, on the same cycle as our executive compensation.

2022 Cash Compensation of Directors. During 2021,2022, we paid each non-employee director a flat fee of $20,000 for their board and committee meeting attendance and participation, except for members of the Audit Committee who received a flat fee of $22,500, and an annual retainer of $5,000,$10,000, except for the Audit Committee Chair and Nominating and Corporate Governance Chair, each of whom was paid an additional retainer of $7,500, and the Compensation Committee Chair who was paid an additional retainer of $2,000. These amounts were the same in 20212022 as they were in 2020. Beginning2021, except that the annual retainer for service on the Board was increased from $5,000 during 2021 to $10,000 during 2022 commensurate with the ongoing increase in 2021,the responsibilities of our board members. In addition, non-employee directors hadhave the option to elect to receive shares of HealthStream, Inc. common stock pursuant to the terms of the 20162022 Plan in lieu of the cash compensation otherwise payable to such non-employee directors (with such number of shares to be based on the fair market value of our common stock at such times that the cash compensation would otherwise be payable) by making an election to this effect by the end of the prior calendar year.

20212022 Equity Compensation of Directors. During 2021,2022, we granted 2,8303,445 restricted share units (“RSUs”) (with a grant date fair value of $70,002) to each non-employee director of the Company, with the exception of Terry Allison Rappuhn who received an additional grant of 541 RSUs (with a grant date fair value of $10,993) in connection with her appointment to the Board in January 2022, under our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The RSUs vest annually, in three equal increments as of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date pursuant to the provisions of the 2016 Plan as discussed below, provided that the non-employee director continues to serve as a director on such vesting dates. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted to directors in 20212022 (exclusive of the additional grant to Ms. Rappuhn as noted above) was approximately the same as$5,000 more than the grant date fair value of RSUs granted to directors in 2020.2021. Directors must remain in the service of the Company as a director for the RSUs to vest unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee.

Employee directors are not eligible for any compensation for service on the Board or its committees.

Summary of 20212022 Director Compensation. The following table sets forth the compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors during 2021.2022.

The following table shows the aggregate number of outstanding RSUs held by each non-employee director at fiscal year-end 2021.2022.

2022 Director Compensation. For 2022, the Compensation Committee determined to increase the annual retainer fee paid to each non-employee director from $5,000 to $10,000. There were no other changes made from 2021 with regard to the amount of payment for annual cash retainers paid to non-employee directors, including committee chairs, for board and committee attendance.

For 2022, we granted 3,445 RSUs to each non-employee director of the Company, with the exception of Terry Allison Rappuhn who received 3,986 RSUs under our 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The grant date fair value of the RSUs granted to directors in 2022 was approximately $10,000 more than the grant date fair value of RSUs granted to directors in 2021. These RSUs will vest annually, in three equal increments as of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date.

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers of the Company. Information pertaining to Mr. Frist, who is both a director and an executive officer of the Company, is located in the section entitled “Directors.”

J. Edward Pearson joined the Company in June 2006 as senior vice president and was promoted to chief operating officer in 2011 and to president on May 15, 2018. He earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Middle Tennessee State University.

Michael M. Collier joined the Company in August 2011 as vice president and general counsel, began serving as the vice president of business development and general counsel shortly thereafter, was promoted to senior vice president in July 2017, and was promoted to executive vice president, corporate strategy and development in April 2022. From August 2011 through the end of 2022, Mr. Collier also served as the Company’s Corporate Secretary. He graduated with bachelors and masters degrees in Philosophy and Religion from University of Tennessee-Knoxville and earned a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) from University of California, Berkeley – School of Law.

Michael Sousa joined the Company in October 2004 and served as senior vice president of sales from January 2010 to June 2014. In June 2014, he was promoted to senior vice president of business development. In February 2015, he was named president of HealthStream’s Provider Solutions business segment, while continuing to serve as a senior vice president of the Company. In February 2023, he was promoted to executive vice president, Enterprise Applications. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration from Boston University.

Scott A. Roberts joined the Company in January 2002 and served as vice president of accounting and finance beginning in January 2015, following service in multiple positions to which he was promoted. Thereafter, Mr. Roberts was appointed as interim chief financial officer in February 2019 and was appointed as chief financial officer and senior vice president of the Company in September 2019. He earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Middle Tennessee State University.

Jeffrey D. Cunningham joined the Company in July 2017 as senior vice president and chief technology officer. Prior to joining the Company, he founded and served as chief technology officer and chief strategy officer for Informatics Corporation of America for twelve years. He earned a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from the University of North Texas.

Michael Sousa joined the Company in October 2004 and served as senior vice president of sales from January 2010 to June 2014. In June 2014, he was promoted to senior vice president of business development. In February 2015, he was named president of Echo, Inc. (now known as VerityStream), HealthStream’s Provider Solutions business segment, while continuing to serve as a senior vice president of the Company. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Boston College and a Master of Business Administration from Boston University.

Michael M. Collier joined the Company in August 2011 as vice president and general counsel, began serving as the vice president of business development and general counsel shortly thereafter, and was promoted to senior vice president of corporate development and general counsel in July 2017. Mr. Collier also serves as the Company’s Corporate Secretary. He graduated with bachelors and masters degrees in Philosophy and Religion from University of Tennessee-Knoxville and earned a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) from University of California, Berkeley – School of Law.

Trisha L. Coady joined the Company in January 2014 and served as associate vice president and subsequently vice president and general manager of clinical development solutions from June 2015 to November 2018. In November 2018, she was promoted to senior vice president and general manager of clinical solutions. Ms. Coady currently serves as senior vice president of workforce development solutions. She earned a Bachelor of Science in Nursing degree from Université de Moncton.

M. Scott McQuigg joined the Company in January 2019 as senior vice president of hStream solutions and in January 2021 began servingthen served as general manager of workforce scheduling solutions. Mr. McQuigg currently serves as senior vice president of digital & network development. Prior to joining the Company, he co-founded and served as chief executive officer for GoNoodle for thirteen years. Before this role, he co-founded and served as chief executive officer of HealthLeaders.

Kevin O’Hara joined the Company in January 2021 as senior vice president and general manager of platform solutions and currently serves as senior vice president of platform solutions. Prior to joining the Company, he served as chief product officer for Caresyntax for one year and as chief executive officer for Syus, a predecessor entity, for eight years. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy Studies and a J.D. from Vanderbilt University.

Scott Fenstermacher joined the Company in 2012 and served as vice president of sales beginning in 2017 and was promoted to senior vice president of sales in January 2021. He graduated from University of Pittsburgh with a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Science.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Summary

Company Performance in 20212022 and Impact on Executive Compensation

In 2021,2022, the Company continued its focus on improving patient outcomes through the development of healthcare organizations’ greatest asset: their people.

Below is an overview of the Company’s performance in 20212022 as compared to 2020.2021.

We ended 20212022 capitalized with a$53.9 million in cash and marketable securities balance of $51.9 million and full availability ofunder our $65.0 million line of credit.revolving credit facility.

Compensation decisions for Named Executive Officers in 20212022 reflected the results of the Company’s performance and are summarized in the bullets below.

Overview of Compensation Process. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board is comprised solely of independent directors. The Compensation Committee during 20212022 was comprised of Frank Gordon (Chair), Jeffrey McLaren, and Linda Rebrovick, each of whom is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the compensation of the Company’s executive officers, overseeing the Board’s evaluation of the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, and administering the Company’s equity-based and incentive plans for our Named Executive Officers, among other things. The Compensation Committee undertakes these responsibilities pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Compensation Committee, which is reviewed at least annually by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee Charter may be accessed on our website in the “Corporate Governance” section of our Investor Relations page at www.healthstream.com.

The Compensation Committee did not engage any compensation consultant in relation to the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of director and executive officer compensation in 2021.2022.

The Compensation Committee annually reviews executive compensation and the Company’s compensation policies to ensure that the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers are rewarded appropriately for their contributions to the Company and that our overall compensation strategy supports the objectives and values of our organization, as well as shareholder interests. The Compensation Committee also annually reviews the executive officers’ expense reimbursements with the Company’s Controller.

The Compensation Committee solicits the views and recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer when setting the base salaries of each member of the executive team, other than the Chief Executive Officer, given his insight into internal pay equity and positioning issues, as well as executive performance. At a committee meeting typically held during the first quarter of each year, the Chief Executive Officer summarizes his assessment of the performance during the previous year of each member of the executive team, other than the Chief Executive Officer, including his recommendations on compensation for such members of the executive team, other than the Chief Executive Officer. Following the Chief Executive Officer’s presentation and Compensation Committee discussion, the Compensation Committee discusses and approves the compensation for each member of the executive team, other than the Chief Executive Officer, based on competitive considerations, the Chief Executive Officer’s assessment of individual performance, the Company’s overall performance, and the executive’s current compensation package.

The process is similar for determining the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, except that the Chief Executive Officer does not provide the Compensation Committee with a recommendation or otherwise participate in discussions regarding his compensation. The Compensation Committee meets to discuss and approve the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, based on its assessment of the Chief Executive Officer’s performance, the Company’s performance, competitive considerations, the Chief Executive Officer’s current compensation package, and other factors which may be deemed appropriate by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also solicits comments about the Chief Executive Officer’s performance from the other independent directors.

20212022 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation. At the Company’s 20212022 annual meeting of shareholders, shareholders holding approximately 97%98% of the votes cast voted to approve, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation as described in our proxy statement. The Compensation Committee believes this affirmed shareholders’ support of the Company’s approach to executive compensation.

Compensation Philosophy. The fundamental objective of our executive compensation policies is to attract and maintain executive leadership that will execute the Company’s business strategy, uphold the Company’s mission, vision, and values, and deliver results and long-term value to the Company’s shareholders. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee seeks to develop and maintain a compensation structure that will attract, retain, and motivate highly qualified and high-performing executives through compensation that is fair, balanced, aligned with shareholder interests, and linked to overall financial performance.

We believe we have a strong “pay for performance” philosophy designed to reward executive officers for maximizing our success, as determined by our performance relative to our financial and operational goals. The Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy for the executive team emphasizes an overall analysis of the executive’s performance for the past year, projected role and responsibilities for the coming year, required impact on execution of the Company’s strategy, total cash and equity compensation, and other factors the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. In addition, while the Compensation Committee may consider information regarding executive compensation paid at companies comparable to the Company as part of a “market check” with the goal of ensuring that the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers is reasonably competitive in comparison to compensation at such comparable companies, the Compensation Committee does not target or benchmark any element of compensation or the total compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers based on compensation surveys or data or the executive compensation practices of other public companies. Our philosophy also considers employee retention, vulnerability to recruitment by other companies, and the difficulty and costs associated with replacing executive talent. Based on these objectives, the Compensation Committee has determined that our Company should provide its executives compensation packages comprised of three primary elements: (i) base salary, which reflects individual performance and is designed to provide a secure level of guaranteed cash compensation; (ii) annual cash bonuses based on the overall financial performance of the Company and, in the case of Mr. Sousa, the performance of the business segment for which Mr. Sousa is most directly responsible (Provider Solutions), in accordance with annual goals established by the Compensation Committee; and (iii) long-term equity-based incentive awards which further align the interests between executive officers and our shareholders.

The specific analysis regarding the components of total executive compensation for 20212022 are described below. The primary components of the 20212022 program were cash compensation, consisting of a base salary and bonuses, and equity incentives, consisting of time-based and performance-based RSUs.

Base Salary. We seek to provide base salaries for our executive officers that provide a secure level of guaranteed cash compensation in accordance with their experience, professional status, and job responsibilities. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves a revised annual salary plan for executive officers, taking into account several factors, including prior year salary, responsibilities, tenure, performance, salaries paid by similar companies for comparable positions solely for purposes of a “market check” with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s base salary levels are reasonably competitive compared to base salary levels at similar companies, and the Company’s recent financial performance. Taking these factors into account, the Compensation Committee approved base salaries for the Named Executive Officers in the amounts in the following table.

Cash Bonuses. In addition to base salary, our cash bonus plan compensation provides our executive officers with the potential for enhanced cash compensation based on the financial performance of the Company and, in the case of Mr. Sousa, based on the financial performance of the business unit for which Mr. Sousa is most responsible (Provider Solutions). On March 17, 2021,Company. In April 2022, the Compensation Committee established two cash bonus plans,adopted the “Primary2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan” which was for each Named Executive Officer and certain other vice presidents and directors of the Company, and the “VerityStream Bonus Plan,” which was for certain members of management of VerityStream (our Provider Solutions business segment), including Mr. Sousa.Company. In connection with the adoption of the Primary2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee established performance objectives that would reward Named Executive Officers and certain other vice presidents and directors of the Company for achieving 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA goals (as defined below). For purposes of this bonus calculation, “2021“2022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA” was defined as our consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022, as set forth in Appendix A herein, as adjusted for bonuses,publicly disclosed by the Company, subject to the following adjustments: (i) excluding acquisition-related expenses incurred during the year to the extent such expenses were in excess of the amount budgeted,originally allocated to such purpose in the Company's 2022 budget, and Adjusted(ii) excluding the impact on adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions and divestitures consummated during the year. For purposes of clarity, the calculation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA as publicly disclosed by the Company, as well as 2022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA, takes into account any bonus amounts payable by the Company under the 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan. See Appendix A for additional information regarding Adjusted EBITDA as publicly disclosed by the Company, including a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022 to the most comparable GAAP measure, net income. The Compensation Committee chose 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA as the measure under the Primary2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan because it believed that this was a key measure of our operating performance during 20212022 and because it believes that this measure correlates over time with long-term shareholder value.

The 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan for the Named Executive Officers who participated in this plan was structured with a target payout opportunity of 30 percent of base salary for Mr. Roberts and Ms. Coady and 40 percent of base salary for Messrs. Frist, Sousa, and Pearson.

Under the 2022 Cash Incentive Plan, the bonus pool was funded in increments based on meeting or exceeding certain performance level goals. Once the "Threshold" performance level (as set forth in the table below) is reached, then 25% of the bonus pool was funded. Incremental adjusted EBITDA above the Threshold performance level then begins to fund the remaining 75% of the bonus pool up to 100% of the bonus pool, which amount is reached upon achievement of the "Target" performance level (as set forth in the table below). If the Target performance level under the 2022 Cash Incentive Plan was achieved, then Messrs. Roberts, Frist, Sousa, and Pearson, and Ms. Coady, would be eligible to receive up to an additional 15% of their base salary (e.g., up to a total of 45% of base salary for Mr. Roberts and Ms. Coady and up to 55% of base salary for Messrs. Frist, Sousa, and Pearson). The additional amount is funded by incremental adjusted EBITDA achieved in excess of the Target performance level and is fully funded upon achievement of the "Maximum" performance level (as defined below). If the Threshold performance level is not achieved, then no payout is made. Payouts under the 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan are linearly interpolated between threshold, target, and maximum performance goal levels.

The Primary Bonus Plan for the Named Executive Officers who participate in this plan was structured to pay bonuses in a maximum amount of 8 percent of base salary for Mr. Sousa, 30 percent of base salary for Messrs. O'Hara and Roberts, and 40 percent of base salary for Messrs. Frist and Pearson. The maximum percentage cash bonus opportunities under the Primary Bonus Plan were the same in both 2020 and 2021 for all Named Executive Officers, provided that, as part of expense management measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Compensation Committee made a determination on October 7, 2020, to reduce the maximum bonus opportunity under the Primary Bonus Plan for 2020 payable to our Named Executive Officers by one-third, such that following such reduction the maximum cash bonus opportunities payable to our Named Executive Officers represented two-thirds of the originally approved maximum bonus amounts.

In order to receive any payout, the Primary2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan required achievement by the Company of 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA during 2021 of $37.3 million, with a maximum payout requiring achievement of 2021 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA during 2021 of $38.7 million. Named Executive Officers were (i) not eligible to receive cash bonuses under the Primary Bonus Plan if the Company achieved 2021 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA of less than $37.3 million, (ii) eligible to receive the maximum bonus (8 percent for Mr. Sousa, 30 percent for Messrs. O'Hara and Roberts, and 40 percent for Messrs. Frist and Pearson of base salary) if the Company achieved at least $38.7 million of 2021 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA, and (iii) eligible to receive an incremental payout between zero and 8 percent for Mr. Sousa, between zero and 30 percent for Messrs. O'Hara and Roberts, and between zero and 40 percent for Messrs. Frist and Pearson, of base salary on a straight-line interpolation basis to the extent the Company achieved 2021 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA between $37.3 million and $38.7 million. goal levels as follows:

The bonus payment scale was established with the intent of aligning the interests of our Named Executive Officers with our shareholders and to incentivize our executive officers by funding the bonus pool incrementally based on the amount of 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA meeting or exceeding the Company’s thresholdperformance levels of 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA.EBITDA set forth in the chart above.

The 20212022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA in 2021,2022, as defined above, was approximately $55.0$53.2 million, which was aboveexceeded the maximumTarget performance level of $38.7$52.7 million, and thereforebut was less than the Company paidMaximum performance level of $57.2 million. This achievement resulted in the maximum cash bonuses to the Named Executive Officers set forth above under the Primary Bonus Plan.

The VerityStream Bonus Plan was structured to pay a bonus in a maximum amountpayout of 4032 percent of base salary for Mr. Sousa, being comprised of 32Roberts and Ms. Coady and 42 percent from the VerityStream Bonus Plan and 8 percent from the Primary Bonus Plan, as noted above. The maximum percentage cash bonus opportunity available to Mr. Sousa under the VerityStream Bonus Plan was the same in both 2020 and 2021, provided that, as part of the expense management measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic noted above, the Compensation Committee made a determination on October 7, 2020 to reduce the maximum bonus opportunitybase salary for 2020 under the VerityStream Bonus Plan by one-third, such that following such reduction the maximum bonus opportunity represented two-thirds of the originally approved maximum bonus amount.

The Compensation Committee established performance objectives under the VerityStream Bonus Plan that would reward Mr.Messrs. Frist, Sousa, and certain members of management of VerityStream for exceeding financial targets with respect to VerityStream established by the Compensation Committee. The VerityStream Bonus Plan was structured to provide bonus payouts (as a percentage of base salary) for achieving 2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) goals for 2021 (as defined below). In order to receive any payout, the VerityStream Bonus Plan required achievement of 2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA of $14.8 million with a maximum payout requiring achievement of $15.3 million. "2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA" for purposes of the VerityStream Bonus Plan was the Provider Solutions business segment’s adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for bonuses, acquisition-related expenses with respect to VerityStream incurred during the year to the extent such expenses were in excess of the amount budgeted, and EBITDA from acquisitions consummated during the year with respect to VerityStream. Mr. Sousa was (i) not eligible to receive a cash bonus if VerityStream achieved 2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA of less than $14.8 million, (ii) eligible to receive a cash bonus of 32 percent of base salary if VerityStream achieved at least $15.3 million of 2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA, and (iii) eligible to receive an incremental payout between zero and 32 percent of base salary based on straight-line interpolation to the extent that VerityStream achieved 2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA between $14.8 million and $15.3 million.Pearson.

2021 Incentive Plan VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA in 2021, as defined above, was approximately $18.7 million, which was above the maximum threshold level of $15.3 million. Therefore, the Company paid the maximum cash bonus to Mr. Sousa set forth above under the VerityStream Bonus Plan.

Long-Term Stock-Based Incentive Compensation. As described above, one of our key compensation philosophies is that long-term stock-based incentive compensation strengthens the alignment of the interests of our executive officers with our shareholders. The Compensation Committee believes that the strategy of granting time-based vesting restricted stock units (RSU) awards is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders, as the value of such awards is tied to the stock price of the Company, and executive officers only receive the benefit from these awards to the extent they continue their employment with the Company through the applicable vesting periods. In addition, the Compensation Committee has approved the grant of performance-based vesting restricted stock unit awards to certain of our executive officers from time to time, but did not do soincluding in 2021.2022.

The Compensation Committee may also approve additional equity incentive awards (including performance-based equity awards) in certain special circumstances, such as promotion of an executive officer to a new position, the addition of new executive team members, or in recognition of special contributions or achievements by an executive officer.officer, or for retention purposes or to further incentivize executive officers. Such additional equity incentive awards, such as performance-based RSU grants, are separate and distinct from the Company’s annual time-based RSU grants, and are awarded only when the Compensation Committee determines that such performance-based RSU grants are merited.

The time-based RSU awards made to our Named Executive Officers in 20212022 as part of our annual equity grant were consistent with the Company’s retention, performance, and shareholder alignment objectives, and were also generally consistent in nature and amount (from a grant date fair value perspective) with annual equity grants made in recent years. Theobjectives. Historically, the Compensation Committee typically approveshas approved annual awards at its first quarter committee meeting, andwhich is the process that was followed this process in 2021 by granting2022 when the grant of time-based RSU awards to each of our Named Executive Officers was approved by the Compensation Committee on March 17,23, 2022 in the following amounts: Robert A. Frist, Jr. - 6,471 RSUs; J. Edward Pearson - 6,471 RSUs; Michael Sousa - 6,471 RSUs; Scott A. Roberts - 4,921 RSUs; and Trisha Coady - 4,921 RSUs (in addition, as described below, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of additional time-based RSU awards in October 2022). In this regard, the grant of certain of these time-based RSU awards (the time-based RSU awards to Messrs. Frist, Pearson, Sousa, and Roberts, but not including Ms. Coady) approved by the Compensation Committee on March 23, 2022, was conditioned upon and subject to shareholder approval of the 2022 Plan (including the increase in the number of shares authorized under the 2022 Plan) at the Company’s 2022 annual meeting of shareholders on May 26, 2022. The Company’s shareholders approved the 2022 Plan at such annual meeting, and as such these conditional awards to the named executive officers set forth above had a grant date for accounting purposes under FASB ASC Topic 718 of May 26, 2022. The grant date fair value of these time-based RSUs to Messrs. Frist, Pearson, and Sousa approved in March 2022 (prior to giving effect to the grant of time-based RSU awards in October 2022 as described below) was generally consistent with the grant date fair value of annual time-based RSUs awarded to these individuals in recent years. The grant date fair value of the time-based RSU awards to Mr. Roberts and Ms. Coady approved in March 2022 (prior to giving effect to the grant of time-based RSU awards in October 2022 as described below) was less than the grant date fair value of annual time-based RSUs awarded to these individuals in 2021, taking into account the fact that Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts also received an award of performance-based RSUs in March 2022 as noted below. In this regard, on March 23, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of 12,303 performance-based RSUs to each of Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts in recognition of Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts' executive leadership and to incentivize Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts in connection with the Company’s achievement of key annual performance objectives over a five-year time horizon, as described in greater detail below.

In October 2022, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to modify the annual grant program with respect to time-based RSUs so that what had previously been an annual grant of time-based RSUs (generally in March) would be divided into two semi-annual grants to be awarded approximately six months apart. In this regard, the Compensation Committee determined that it would be advisable (i) to split the annual award of time-based RSUs into two semi-annual grants, with the intention that 50% of the grant date fair value of awards would be granted in the first half of each year and the other 50% of the grant date fair value of awards would be granted in the second half of each year, which would result in staggered vesting periods intended to promote retention, and (ii) increase the grant date fair value of such committee meeting. In addition, as noted above, Kevin O'Hara received a grantsemi-annual grants of 8,125 time-based RSUs on January 8, 2021,an aggregate (annual) basis to be approximately 15% - 20% (15% as to the annual grant date fair value of time-based RSUs for Messrs. Frist, Pearson, and Sousa, and 20% as to the annual grant date fair value of time-based RSUs for Mr. Roberts and Ms. Coady) higher than the grant date value of annual time-based RSUs approved by the Compensation Committee in March 2022. To commence such semi-annual grant program, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of time-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers in October 2022, with the grant date fair value of such grants intended to equal approximately 50% of the total anticipated rolling annual grant date value of time-based RSUs to be made to our Named Executive Officers under such program (after giving effect to the approximate 15% - 20% grant date fair value increase referenced in clause (ii) of the prior sentence), with the intent to grant time-based RSUs with a grant date fair value equal to the remaining 50% of such awards in March 2023. In connection with joiningtherewith, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of the time-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers in the following amounts in October 2022: Robert A. Frist, Jr. – 3,196 RSUs; J. Edward Pearson – 3,196 RSUs; Michael Sousa – 3,196 RSUs; Scott A. Roberts – 2,556 RSUs; and Trisha Coady – 2,556 RSUs. In addition, in October 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a grant to Ms. Coady of an additional 6,000 time-based RSUs as a means of creating parity among senior vice president equity grants within the Company over the last five years.

The Compensation Committee believed it in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to approve the changes described above with respect to the Company’s time-based RSU grant program in order to incentivize and promote retention of the Company’s executive officers, including (taking into account the contemplated increase in the grant date fair value of time-based RSUs to be awarded to the Company’s executive officers on an annual basis as andescribed above) to further the goal of ensuring that the Company’s long-term incentive levels were reasonably competitive compared to those at similar companies from a general “market check” perspective. In addition, the Compensation Committee believed that the staggered vesting periods associated with such a semi-annual time-based RSU grant program would be helpful to promote retention.

Consistent with the semi-annual grant framework reflected above, the Compensation Committee approved, in March 2023, the semi-annual grant of time-based RSUs to our Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Pearson, who was not awarded any time-based RSUs at this time as the result of the fact that Mr. Pearson intends to retire as our President and Chief Operating Officer effective June 30, 2023) with a grant date fair value which approximately equaled the grant date fair value of the time-based RSUs awarded in October 2022 as described above, and intends to continue to make semi-annual grants of time-based RSUs to the Company’s executive officerofficers on a going forward basis (including later in January 2021.2023). 

Each time-based RSU described above represents the contractual right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock. The RSUs approved in March 2022 and October 2022 are subject to the terms of the 2016 Plan and the 2022 Plan (as applicable), as well as the individual grant award agreements. The time-based RSUs granted to our Named Executive Officers during 2021in March 2022 and October 2022 as noted above vest annually in four increasing increments of 15%, 20%, 30%, and 35% as of the first, second, third, and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively, provided that the grantee is employed on such vesting date. Further, vesting is subject to acceleration under certain circumstances as contemplated in the 2016 Plan and the 2022 Plan (as applicable), and/or the individual grant agreement.

The chart below summarizes the time-based equity awards made to our Named Executive Officers in March 2022 and October 2022. Performance-based equity awards made to Named Executive Officers during 2021.2022 are discussed in the narrative below the chart.

In recent years, the Compensation Committee has reviewed and approved a long-term equity grant for executive officers, taking into account several factors, including prior year grant date value, responsibilities, tenure, performance, long-term equity incentives awarded by similar companies for comparable positions solely for purposes of a “market check” with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s long term incentive levels are reasonably competitive compared those at similar companies, and the Company’s recent financial performance. The Committee took these factors into account in determining the appropriate long-term equity grants for executive officers during 2021.

In addition,May 2018, the Compensation Committee made a determination to grant Mr. Pearson performance-based RSUs in May 2018 in connection with Mr. Pearson’s promotion to President in recognition of Mr. Pearson’s increased responsibilities and to incentivize Mr. Pearson in connection with the Company’s achievement of key annual performance objectives over a five-year time horizon. In connection with this grant, Mr. Pearson received 35,000 performance-based RSUs, which were eligible for vesting in five increments of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% on March 15, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively, based on whether the Company hashad achieved certain annual financial performance targets (which may include, among other things, operating income, adjusted EBITDA and revenue thresholds) for the fiscal year preceding such vesting as determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis, subject to Mr. Pearson’s continuing employment as of any such vesting date.

The Compensation Committee also made a determination to grant Mr. Sousa performance-based RSUs in May 2018 to recognize and to promote parity among President roles and to incentivize Mr. Sousa in connection with the attainment by VerityStream of key annual performance objectives over a five-year time horizon. In connection with this grant, Mr. Sousa received 35,000 performance-based RSUs in May 2018 which were eligible for vesting in five increments of 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% on March 15, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, respectively, based on whether the business unit over which Mr. Sousa iswas President (currently, VerityStream) has(VerityStream) had achieved annual financial performance targets (which may include, among other things, operating income, adjusted EBITDA and revenue thresholds for VerityStream) for the fiscal year preceding such vesting as determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis, subject to Mr. Sousa’s continuing employment as of any such vesting date.

During 2022, the performance criteria was established for the final 10,500 of the performance based RSUs granted to each of Messrs. Pearson and Sousa, the vesting of which was based on the achievement of performance criteria for 2022 as described in greater detail below. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Summary Compensation Table set forth below for 2022 reflects the grant date fair value of these 10,500 performance-based RSUs for each of Messrs. Pearson and Sousa.

The performance criteria for Mr. Pearson’s final 10,500 RSUs granted in 2018 which were eligible for vesting based on the performance period in 2022 and for which performance criteria was established in 2022, was based upon the achievement of 2022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA. “2022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA” was defined as our consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022, as publicly disclosed by the Company, subject to the following adjustments: (i) excluding acquisition-related expenses incurred during the year to the extent such expenses were in excess of the amount originally allocated to such purpose in the Company’s 2022 budget, and (ii) excluding the impact on adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions and divestitures consummated during the year. The performance criteria for these awards was structured to provide (i) 100% vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA greater than or equal to $52.0 million, and (ii) no vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA below $52.0 million. The Company achieved 2022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA of $53.2 million for purposes of this performance criteria. Therefore 100% of these 10,500 RSUs vested for Mr. Pearson for the performance period of 2022. In addition, all of the performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Pearson in 2018 which were eligible for vesting based on 2021 performance previously vested in full, such that Mr. Pearson did not have any performance-based RSUs eligible for catch-up vesting in relation to 2022 performance.

The performance criteria for Mr. Sousa’s final 10,500 RSUs granted in 2018, which were eligible for vesting based on the performance period in 2022 and for which performance criteria was established in 2022, was based upon achievement of VerityStream’s adjusted EBITDA during 2022, as adjusted for acquisition-related expenses incurred by VerityStream during the year and adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions consummated during the year with respect to VerityStream (the "2022 RSU VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA"). The performance criteria for these awards was structured to provide (i) 100% vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA greater than or equal to $17.1 million, and (ii) no vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA below $17.1 million. VerityStream achieved 2022 RSU VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of this performance criteria of $17.2 million, and therefore 100% of these 10,500 RSUs vested for Mr. Sousa for the performance period of 2022. In addition, all of the performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Sousa in 2018 which were eligible for vesting based on 2021 performance previously vested in full, such that Mr. Sousa did not have any performance-based RSUs eligible for catch-up vesting in relation to 2022 performance.

As noted above, the Compensation Committee also made a determination to grant Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts performance-based RSUs in March 2022 in recognition of Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts' executive leadership and to incentivize Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts in connection with the Company’s achievement of key annual performance objectives over a five-year time horizon. In connection with this grant, each of Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts received 12,303 performance-based RSUs, which were eligible for vesting in five increments of 15%, 20%, 20%, 20%, and 25% on March 23, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, and 2027, respectively, based on whether the Company has achieved certain annual financial performance targets (which may include, among other things, adjusted EBITDA and revenue thresholds) for the fiscal year preceding such vesting as determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis, subject to Ms. Coady and Mr. Roberts' continuing employment as of any such vesting date.

Ms. Coady’s and Mr. Roberts’ award agreements provide that, to the extent that any RSUs do not vest in any year (based on the failure to fully achieve the performance criteria for any such year) (the “Catch-Up RSUs”)(Catch-Up RSUs), any such Catch-Up RSUs will be eligible for vesting in connection with the achievement of performance criteria in the next year (but not in succeeding years) as determined by the Compensation Committee (which performance criteria for the Catch-Up RSUs may require the overachievement of the applicable performance metric(s) for such year).

During 2021,2022, the performance criteria was established for 8,7501,845 of the performance basedperformance-based RSUs granted to each of Messrs. PearsonMs. Coady and Sousa,Mr. Roberts, the vesting of which was based on the achievement of performance criteria for 20212022 as described in greater detail below. In accordance with SEC guidance, the Summary Compensation Table set forth below for 20212022 reflects the grant date fair value of these 8,750 performance based1,845 performance-based RSUs for each of Messrs. PearsonMs. Coady and Sousa.Mr. Roberts.

The performance criteria for Ms. Coady’s and Mr. Pearson’s 8,750Roberts' 1,845 RSUs granted in 20182022 which were eligible for vesting based on the performance period in 20212022 and for which performance criteria was established in 2021,2022, was based upon the achievement of our consolidated adjusted EBITDA during 2021, as adjusted for acquisition related expenses incurred during the year and adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions consummated during the year (the "RSU 20212022 RSU Company Adjusted EBITDA").EBITDA, as defined above. The performance criteria for these awards was structured to provide (i) 100% vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU 2021 Company Adjusted EBITDA greater than or equal to $37.1$52.0 million, and (ii) no vesting of RSUs for achieving 2022 RSU 2021 Company Adjusted EBITDA below $37.1$52.0 million. The Company achieved 2022 RSU 2021 Company Adjusted EBITDA of $53.2 million for purposes of this performance criteria of $52.5 million.criteria. Therefore, 100% of these 8,7501,845 RSUs vested for Ms. Coady and Mr. PearsonRoberts for the performance period of 2021. In addition, all of the performance-based RSUs granted to Mr. Pearson in 2018 which were eligible for vesting based on 2020 performance previously vested in full, such that Mr. Pearson did not have any performance-based RSUs eligible for catch-up vesting in relation to 2021 performance.

The performance criteria for Mr. Sousa’s 8,750 RSUs granted in 2018, which were eligible for vesting based on the performance period in 2021 and for which performance criteria was established in 2021, was based upon achievement of VerityStream’s adjusted EBITDA during 2021, as adjusted for acquisition-related expenses with respect to VerityStream incurred during the year and adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions consummated during the year with respect to VerityStream (the "RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA"). The performance criteria for these awards was structured to provide (i) 100% vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA greater than or equal to $14.8 million, and (ii) no vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA below $14.8 million. VerityStream achieved RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of this performance criteria of $18.7 million, and therefore 100% of these 8,750 RSUs vested for Mr. Sousa for the performance period of 2021. In addition, since the 7,000 performance-based RSUs awarded to Mr. Sousa in May 2018 which were eligible for vesting based on 2020 performance did not vest, these RSUs were eligible for vesting based on 2021 performance based on criteria established in 2021 by the Compensation Committee per the catch-up provisions discussed above. The performance criteria for these Catch-Up RSUs was structured to provide (i) 100% vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA greater than or equal to $15.6 million, (ii) 75% vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA between $15.4 million and $15.6 million, (iii) 50% vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA between $15.2 million and $15.4 million, (iv) 25% vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA between $15.0 million and $15.2 million, and (v) no vesting of RSUs for achieving RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA below $15.0 million. To achieve 100% vesting of these Catch-Up RSUs required RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA to exceed the 2021 vesting target of $14.8 million by an amount equal to or greater than the shortfall of VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA (as defined and determined under the performance criteria previously established for 2020 in connection with Mr. Sousa's performance-based RSUs) of $15.2 million in 2020 against the 2020 vesting target of $16.0 million (i.e., $0.8 million—the amount by which the 2020 vesting target was missed). VerityStream achieved RSU 2021 VerityStream Adjusted EBITDA for purposes of this performance criteria of $18.7 million, and therefore 100% of these 7,000 Catch-Up RSUs vested for Mr. Sousa for the performance period of 2021.2022.

The performance criteria for the remaining 10,500 performance based10,458 performance-based RSUs granted to Messrs. Pearsoneach of Ms. Coady and SousaMr. Roberts in May 2018March 2022 are determined based on the achievement of financial performance criteria on an annual basis as follows: 2,461 RSUs in 2022.2023, 2,461 RSUs in 2024, 2,460 RSUs in 2025, and 3,076 RSUs in 2026. The performance-based RSUs for Messrs. PearsonMs. Coady and SousaMr. Roberts vesting based on performance in 20222023 and succeeding years will be reported in the Summary Compensation Table during the year in 2022 whenwhich the performance criteria is set by the Compensation Committee and the Company is able to determine the grant date fair value.

The Compensation Committee determines the number of RSUs awarded to the executive officers in any year based upon, among other factors, the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer (for awards made to executive officers other than our Chief Executive Officer), prior equity grants, responsibilities, tenure, individual and Company performance, our annual budget, retention considerations, and the estimated annual financial accounting compensation expense associated with the awards.awards, and long-term equity incentives awarded by similar companies for comparable positions solely for purposes of a “market check” with the goal of ensuring that the Company’s long-term incentive levels are reasonably competitive compared to those at similar companies. The weighting of these and other relevant factors is determined on a case-by-case basis for each executive officer so as to reward and incentivize the executive officers for their long-term strategic management of the Company. The Compensation Committee took these factors into account in determining the appropriate equity grants to executive officers during 2022.

Perquisites and Other Benefits. Our executive officers are also eligible for benefits generally available to and on the same terms as the Company’s other employees, including a 401(k) Plan match, health insurance, disability insurance, dental insurance, and life insurance.

Employment Agreement, Severance, and Change In Control Agreements. We entered into an employment agreement with Robert A. Frist, Jr., our Chief Executive Officer, on July 21, 2005, which continues to be in effect. The term of Mr. Frist’s employment agreement is automatically extended for successive one year periods unless, on or before a date that is 90 days prior to the expiration of the then current employment term, either the Company or Mr. Frist shall have given written notice to the other of its or his intention not to further extend the employment term, in which case the employment agreement shall expire and terminate at the end of the then current employment term. Mr. Frist is also entitled to participate in any bonus program or stock option plan that is generally available to our officers or senior management. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Frist has agreed not to compete with the Company and not to solicit our customers or employees for one year after his employment is terminated, with limited exceptions. Mr. Frist is entitled to severance benefits if we terminate him without cause. He is also entitled to severance benefits if he resigns for good reason after a change in control, if he resigns upon the occurrence of a material change in the terms of his employment, or if he resigns upon the occurrence of a material breach of the employment agreement by the Company. If any such termination occurs, Mr. Frist will be entitled to a severance benefit equal to 1.5 times the most recent salary recommended by our Compensation Committee for him. In addition, if Mr. Frist terminates his employment for good reason after the occurrence of a change in control, all options, shares, and other benefits will fully vest immediately. We do not maintain employment, severance, or change in control agreements with any of our other executive officers.

Vesting of Equity Awards upon Change of Control. Under the 2016 Plan and the terms of the award agreements entered into in connection therewith, any outstanding equity awards, consisting of options and RSUs, become fully exercisable and immediately vested upon a change of control, as defined in the 2016 Plan.

Compensation Decisions for 2022. In March 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the performance and compensation of the executive team and discussed the grant of equity-based awards to executive officers. At such time, the Compensation Committee established new base salaries for our Named Executive Officers for 2022 as set forth in the chart below. In April 2022, the Compensation Committee also established the 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan for each of the Named Executive Officers and certain other vice presidents and director level employees of the Company. The 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan reflects tiered cash bonuses as a percentage of base salary for exceeding certain levels of performance noted below. Under this plan, Messrs. Frist, Pearson, and Sousa will be eligible to receive a maximum payout of 55 percent of base salary, and Messrs. Roberts and O'Hara will be eligible to receive a maximum payout of 45 percent of base salary based on the Company’s level of attainment of adjusted EBITDA. For purposes of the 2022 Cash Incentive Bonus Plan, adjusted EBITDA is defined as our consolidated adjusted EBITDA, as adjusted for bonuses, acquisition-related expenses incurred during the year, and adjusted EBITDA from acquisitions consummated during the year ("2022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA"). 

The Compensation Committee also approved the grant of time-based RSUs to management during the March 2022 meeting in the amounts set forth below. Such RSUs will vest annually in increasing increments of 15%, 20%, 30%, and 35% as of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. Additionally, the Compensation Committee also made a determination to grant performance-based RSUs to Messrs. Roberts and O'Hara during the March 2022 meeting in recognition of Messrs. Roberts and O'Hara's executive leadership responsibilities and to incentivize Messrs. Roberts and O'Hara in connection with the Company’s achievement of key annual performance objectives over a five-year time horizon. In connection with this grant, Messrs. Roberts and O'Hara each received 12,303 performance-based RSUs, which were eligible for vesting in five increments of 15%, 20%, 20%, 20%, and 25% on March 23, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, and 2027, based on whether the Company has achieved certain annual financial performance targets (which may include, among other things, operating income, adjusted EBITDA and revenue thresholds) for the fiscal year preceding such vesting as determined by the Compensation Committee on an annual basis, subject to the continuing employment of such executives on any such vesting date. The financial performance metric on which the first tranche of vesting will be based will be 2022 Incentive Plan Company Adjusted EBITDA. With respect to the equity awards in relation to our Named Executive Officers as set forth above, the time-based RSUs granted in 2022 to Messrs. Frist, Pearson, Sousa, and Roberts were conditioned upon and subject to shareholder approval of our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (including the increase in the number of shares authorized under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan as set forth below) as discussed in greater detail below. 

The table below summarizes the 2022 base salary levels and 2022 equity-based incentive awards for the Named Executive Officers.

Tax Deductibility of Compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a corporate deduction for compensation over $1.0 million paid in any tax year to certain of the most highly-compensated officers of a publicly-held company, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The Compensation Committee generally intends to design and administer executive compensation programs in a manner that will preserve the deductibility of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers. However, the Compensation Committee believes that shareholder interests are best served if it retains discretion and flexibility in awarding compensation to our Named Executive Officers, even where the compensation paid under such programs may not be fully deductible. The Compensation Committee may approve the payment of compensation that is in excess of the deductibility limitations of Section 162(m).

Compensation Committee Report for 20212022

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with our management. Taking this review and discussion into account, the undersigned Compensation Committee members recommended the inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our proxy statement on Schedule 14A for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board:

Frank Gordon, Compensation Committee Chairman

Jeffrey L. McLaren, Compensation Committee Member

Linda Rebrovick, Compensation Committee Member

The foregoing report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference the proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information for the fiscal years set forth below regarding the compensation earned by the Named Executive Officers. Consistent with SEC guidance, the chart below does not set forth the compensation of Mr. O'Hara for 2020 and 2019 as Mr. O'Hara was not employed by the Company during such time.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards – Fiscal Year 20212022

The following table provides information related to plan-based awards granted to the Named Executive Officers during the 20212022 fiscal year.